As promised, I've run some tests using windows 7 as well. The test machine used here is a Toshiba Satelite C655 laptop run in 'high performance' power mode. The specs are:
- Intel i3-380m Processor (2.53 Ghz, dual core with hyper-threading for 4 effective cores)
- 4Gb DDR3-1066 RAM (PC3-8500)
- Mobile Intel HD graphics
- Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 (64-bit)
This is a different system to the Vista testbed, so the results are not directly comparable. and are instead for relative comparison.
The test method was identical to the test method used for Vista. Tests were run on a clean user session, with no extensions running, just a plain vanilla configuration. The tested browsers were:
- Internet Explorer 9.0.8112.16421 32-bit mode ('IE9-32')
- Internet Explorer 9.0.8112.16421 64-bit mode ('IE9-64')
- Firefox 4.0
- Opera 11.01
- Chrome 10.0.648.204
Previously, I'd used 4 tests, Peacekeeper, Sunspider (0.91), Acid3 and html5test. Of these, the latter two focus entirely on the capabilities of the browser, with no regard to performance. Theoretically they should be identical then, unless part of the operating system adds some functionality. In order to be sure, the browsers were run through those tests, but the results were identical to the same versions already tested on Vista, and are not included here. Peacekeeper and Sunspider tests results are the main focus here.
The Peacekeeper test is the first one up, as always. IE9-64, is not included on the graph, as Peacekeeper only shows the best result for the browser version on their graphs. However, it was significantly slower in both tests. Here's the peacekeeper graph for the 32-bit browsers:
|Peacekeeper tests, i3-380m/Win7|
click to enlarge
What this shows is that Opera actually beats Chrome on almost all of the tests. The only place it wins is in the data processing, where it blows the others away. In addition, the Complex Graphics score is not included in the final score (since at the time of the tests establishment, it wasn't common on all browsers, although it is now, at least for the major Windows ones). Thus it would seem the final score should be closer between the two.
So, now for Sunspider. The tests were a bit quicker, and fairly close, but again, IE9-64 was significantly slower.
|Shorter is better|
So, are there any major differences between Vista and Win7 performance? Well, let's compare their scores (remember, different hardware, so it's only a relative comparison, rather than direct) between the exact same versions, tested on the two.
As you can see, the biggest boost is to IE, obviously, breaking clear of Firefox. Opera also makes a big improvement as well, closing up on Chrome.
For Sunspider, we get this graph
IE9 and Opera both seem to prefer Windows7 over Vista, moreso than their competitors. Were it not for Chrome's extraordinary 'data' result in the peacekeeper test, it wouldn't even be an issue. Firefox4, much hearalded though it might be, is however being left far behind, kept afloat by an array of add-ons (many of which are based on features integrated into Opera). As I write this, Opera 11.10 has also been released, While Microsoft i s playing along with an early release of IE10. Since this is a comparison between Vista and Win7, I didn't test them. However, It will be interesting to see how they fare.
Windows 7 data
|Total||Rendering||Social Networking||Complex Graphics||Data||DOM operations||Text Parsing|
|IE9 – 64bit||1147.7||3692||4946||1918||7474||4257||2229||7426|
|IE9 – 32bit||244.9||5685||5484||2687||11629||12658||2790||11430|
Windows Vista data